The author begins by disqualifying her academic backgrounds as an educational psychologist and an artist, stating that the former is based purely on «common sense» and the latter is a «waste of time» (both mere «smoke»—or vapor). However, she then opens a door to self-affirmation, arguing that if the purpose of science is to find meaning beyond common sense, and the role of art is to act upon the viewer, then both art and science can serve a purpose—for instance, interpreting a text about a boycott among children as a metaphor for boycotts in adult groups. She concludes by encouraging herself to continue defending her position.